← Search

Jess Flanders

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
302 matches · 212W–90L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history302 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Dent/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Wilkinson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-31 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Alexander
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-25 · Dent/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Penny Wood-Wiener
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-24 · Alexander/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Schnacke
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-30 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abigail Webb championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-09 · Alexander/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Sentilles
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · Gilless/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Gilless
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Schnacke
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Schnacke
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-27 · Alexander/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Berkeley Burbank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Musick/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia House
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Whitney Kilroy championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams118 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
90%
27W–3L · 74.6% of games
3.0
88%
22W–3L · 71.3% of games
3.5
71.3%
67W–27L · 59.1% of games
4.0
49.2%
31W–32L · 48.9% of games
5.5
100%
12W–0L · 80.1% of games
6.5
74.1%
20W–7L · 59.9% of games
7.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 55.3% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.5% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 73.3% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
119 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
75 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe