← Search

Lindsey Myers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 57W–40L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history97 matches
W
2026-11-03 · Mihalko/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsey Savage
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-28 · Mihalko/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsey Savage
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-10-14 · Mihalko/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelley Owens
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-22 · Beanblossom/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Callie Mejia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-17 · Washburn/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ragan Washburn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-15 · Beanblossom/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alison Elkington
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-09 · Washburn/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ragan Washburn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-01 · Beanblossom/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Lackie
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-27 · Washburn/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Josie Hammons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · Beanblossom/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Callie Mejia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Beanblossom/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie McDermott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-28 · Tidwell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Sampson
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 58.4% of games
3.0
70%
21W–9L · 58.1% of games
3.5
29.2%
7W–17L · 43.2% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 60.5% of games
6.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.8% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#1 Singles
16%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer