← Search

Wendi Mihalko

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
251 matches · 122W–129L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history251 matches
L
2026-10-28 · Mihalko/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth McKnight
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-22 · Bennett/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-13 · Bennett/Memphis · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-30 · Mihalko/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-22 · Walton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie McLeod
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanna Eason championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-12 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanna Eason championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-09-11 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanna Eason championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-09-03 · Washburn/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with E'Lane Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · Walton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caroline Schaefer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-13 · Washburn/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with E'Lane Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-11 · Walton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenny Ezzell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 50.4% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
51%
74W–71L · 52.4% of games
4.0
41%
16W–23L · 46.4% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
60%
6W–4L · 54.5% of games
7.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 54.5% of games
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 35.2% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
52 matches
#1 Singles
17%
43 matches
#2 Singles
8%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova