← Search

Bradi Bair

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 108W–49L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history157 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anita Herren
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-10-26 · Moody/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Herren
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-26 · Lacy/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anita Herren
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-10-10 · Lacy/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-10-08 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Mar
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-10-04 · Moody/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Barton championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-23 · Lacy/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Barton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-16 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Barton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Witte
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · Lacy/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Witte
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Lacy/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Benjamin Lacy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 60.9% of games
3.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 59.6% of games
3.5
79.6%
39W–10L · 60.2% of games
4.0
47.8%
11W–12L · 47.4% of games
5.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 69.5% of games
6.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 55.9% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 55.7% of games
4.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 47.7% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
23 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer