← Search

Anita Herren

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Olive Branch, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
233 matches · 158W–75L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history233 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradi Bair
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-10-26 · Moody/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bradi Bair
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-26 · Lacy/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradi Bair
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-10-25 · Moody/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lacey Moody
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-10-24 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Kuenzinger
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-15 · Fowler · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Wright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-10-10 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Kuenzinger
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-28 · Fowler · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracy Duff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-27 · Moody/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Mar
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-22 · Fowler - NC - Southaven · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Wright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-09-12 · Miller/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Barringer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · Fowler - NC - Southaven · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Wright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 61.1% of games
3.0
87.8%
36W–5L · 67.5% of games
3.5
64.9%
37W–20L · 55.8% of games
4.0
42.4%
14W–19L · 47.2% of games
5.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 67% of games
6.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 58.5% of games
7.5
78.9%
15W–4L · 58.6% of games
2.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
46 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal