← Search

Lacey Moody

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 68W–37L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history105 matches
L
2026-10-26 · Moody/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Plosser
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · Moody/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Herren
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-21 · Bratton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melony Bratton
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-09-30 · Bratton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carly McWatters
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Gill championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-15 · Carpenter/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Irvine
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-02 · Bender/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Gill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-20 · Bender/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Longsworth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · Carpenter/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Virginia Wynn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Carpenter/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacqueline Carpenter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-0
W
2026-07-16 · Moody/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Cockrum
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Plosser championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 56.4% of games
3.0
100%
12W–0L · 66% of games
3.5
45.5%
15W–18L · 49.9% of games
4.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 52.1% of games
5.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.2% of games
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 60.1% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert