← Search

Gabriella Yarbrough

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cordova, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 139W–51L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history190 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Moore/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Ferguson
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-26 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Brown
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-10-04 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Moore
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-09-27 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Hervey
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-09-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Ansel championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-09-19 · Bratton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dana Stout
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Bratton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Felicia Powell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-08 · Bratton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Ansel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · Brown/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerry Vaughn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Brown/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Forbes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · Ross/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Amaro
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Ross/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Hervey
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
75%
9W–3L · 59% of games
3.0
84%
21W–4L · 65.1% of games
3.5
86.2%
25W–4L · 61.8% of games
4.0
65.9%
29W–15L · 57.1% of games
4.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 41.3% of games
5.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 62.6% of games
6.5
100%
12W–0L · 66.8% of games
7.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 61.1% of games
4.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.6% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
65 matches
#1 Singles
26%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
22 matches
#2 Singles
7%
14 matches
Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer