← Search

Trisha Dooley

— year-end
99 matches · 64W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Trisha Dooley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Hayes/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristy Pelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-09-03 · Eddy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Muhlbauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · Bratton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leslie Barron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jean Ellen Sisson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · Eddy/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Muhlbauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-16 · Kinney/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jodi Kendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-15 · Bratton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shannon Seay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · Kinney/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marielba Briceno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-28 · Kendall/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Hayes/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eva Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · Bratton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with ROBERT LEBLANC mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Picha/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Teams63 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.3% of games
3.5
75.4%
43W–14L · 60.5% of games
4.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 48.5% of games
6.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.8% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 61% of games
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe