← Search

Emily Green

— year-end
101 matches · 48W–53L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Emily Green to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Emily Green - NC - 18+ 6.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Akil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-09-09 · Nabors/ Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Whitney Mowdy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Emily Green - NC - 18+ 6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maggie Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-13 · Garner 18+ NC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsey Garner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Garner 18+ NC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Felicia Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · Garnett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eva Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Garnett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eva Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Garnett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eva Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Garner 18+ NC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Felicia Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · Garnett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Constance Conley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-04 · Garnett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eva Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · Green - NC - Southaven · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Teams38 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 55.3% of games
3.0
65.8%
25W–13L · 55.1% of games
3.5
21.1%
8W–30L · 37.5% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 47.1% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
30 matches
#1 Singles
29%
29 matches
#2 Singles
18%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
9 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams