← Search

Jessica Lancaster

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bartlett, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
271 matches · 151W–120L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history271 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Miller/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Barringer
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-24 · Conrad/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Conrad
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-10-21 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Default
2026-10-15 · Fowler · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Barringer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-04 · Miller/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dee Bias
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-26 · Conrad/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Pickett
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · Miller/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cameron Seay
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-16 · Conrad/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Barringer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-14 · Fowler · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Barringer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacey Hyde
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
Default
2026-08-29 · Miller/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cameron Seay
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-23 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Barringer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams94 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
60%
6W–4L · 54.2% of games
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
59.2%
87W–60L · 54.7% of games
4.0
37%
10W–17L · 44.8% of games
6.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 55% of games
7.5
53.8%
28W–24L · 54.3% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.5% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
85 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
69 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
16 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer