← Search

Bryan Howell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brandon, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
306 matches · 206W–100L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history306 matches
W
Default
2026-07-21 · Howell, Bryan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Landon McCoy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-07-21 · Howell, Bryan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Langley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-09 · McCoy, Landon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madison Mahaffey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · Howell, Bryan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Eaton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Stubbs championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Haile championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · McCoy, Landon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jayme Griffin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brennan Miller championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Lee championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-14 · McCoy, Landon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madison Mahaffey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · Walker, Niven · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Carmody
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-07 · Sims, Jonathan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Haile
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams88 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 61.1% of games
3.5
76.1%
35W–11L · 60.2% of games
4.0
53.3%
32W–28L · 54.8% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.4% of games
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 69.2% of games
6.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 66.7% of games
7.5
68.2%
30W–14L · 56.9% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 54.3% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 75.8% of games
7.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 57.4% of games
8.0mixed
48%
12W–13L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
88 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
84 matches
Singles
8%
23 matches
#2 Singles
3%
10 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams