← Search

Sarah Coghlan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomington, IN
5.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 22W–16L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history38 matches
W
2026-06-30 · IN/Hullett/A18&Over5.0W · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Shelby Hullett
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · IN/Hullett/A18&Over5.0W · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Danielle Haefele
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
Default
2026-06-02 · IN/Hullett/A18&Over5.0W · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Gabrielle Rubenstein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-05-11 · SS-LGT RED · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Zachary Horn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-06 · SS-LGT RED · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Zachary Horn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-08-27 · SS-H ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elaine Knox
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-21 · CP ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Thomas Cauchi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2024-07-14 · CP ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Thorn Luth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-21 · SS-LGT ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Clapham
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-19 · SS-H GREEN · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Kelleher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-05-14 · SS-LGT ORANGE · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-05-07 · SS-LGT ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elaine Knox
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 64% of games
5.0
75%
3W–1L · 57.1% of games
10.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
45.5%
10W–12L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#1 Singles
16%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams