← Search

Christine Fabina

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
273 matches · 117W–156L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history273 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 W: Jakacki/Gregory · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Cahill championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-10 · NIN FW MXD 55&O 8.0: Webster · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Koehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-23 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffiny Schwartz championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toni Widman
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-22 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Sciole
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Fabina · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Sciole
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Sciole
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Fabina · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tori Schwartz
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Fabina · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Smith
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-23 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Fabina · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beverly Bannister
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · NIN FW 40&O 4.0 W: WW Grabill · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Gibson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 W: WW Fabina · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Smith
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 44.6% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 31.7% of games
4.0
58%
58W–42L · 53% of games
4.5
6.7%
1W–14L · 38% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 48.5% of games
7.5
35.7%
10W–18L · 46.5% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 40.3% of games
8.5
30%
3W–7L · 39.1% of games
7.0mixed
30.6%
11W–25L · 44.4% of games
8.0mixed
46.2%
18W–21L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
113 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
73 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal