← Search

Mary Cecil

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 89W–110L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history199 matches
L
2026-11-02 · LCTA64/Dever/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Felder
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-31 · LCTA54/Adler/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryann Redmond
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-25 · LCTA64/Dever/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denyse Barkley
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-17 · LCTA54/Adler/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dianne Newton
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-21 · LCTA64/Dever/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Cassaday
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · LCTA55/Adler/MPR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Neda Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · LCTA55/Adler/MPR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Marks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-11 · LCTA55/Adler/MPR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mercedes Logan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · LCTA65/Dever/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Cassaday
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · LCTA65/Dever/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Cassaday
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · LCTA65/Dever/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denyse Barkley
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-18 · LCTA65/Dever/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Cassaday
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
45.2%
70W–85L · 49.1% of games
6.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 50.8% of games
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
44 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer