← Search

Jill Balli

Miami, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
305 matches · 161W–144L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jill Balli to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history305 matches
L
2026-08-13 · The Acers at Ron Ehmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mira Hashe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-11 · The Acers at Ron Ehmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Dalmau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · Blanchard (Ron Ehmann) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Helena Maseda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · Blanchard (Ron Ehmann) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Steffi Kordy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · Blanchard (Ron Ehmann) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Steffi Kordy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Allison Cohen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Allison Cohen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Allison Cohen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Allison Cohen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · The Acers at Ron Ehmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Bartsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Blanchard (Ron Ehmann) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jill Hidalgo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · Blanchard (Ron Ehmann) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jill Hidalgo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
54.4%
118W–99L · 51.3% of games
4.5
70.3%
26W–11L · 57.6% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.4% of games
8.5
21.9%
7W–25L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
49 matches
#1 Singles
9%
28 matches
#6 Female Doubles
5%
14 matches
#5 Female Doubles
4%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe