← Search

Mary Bartsh

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Miami, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 56W–55L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history111 matches
W
2026-10-26 · Bartsh Baddies at Tropical Park · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-10-12 · Bartsh Baddies at Tropical Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Feenane
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-05 · Bartsh Baddies at Tropical Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Dalmau
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-28 · Bartsh Baddies at Tropical Park · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-09 · Bartsh Baddies at Tropical Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Weiss
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-28 · Bartsh (Biltmore) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Colonnese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-2
L
2026-08-09 · Bartsh (Biltmore) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Colonnese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · The Acers at Ron Ehmann · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steffi Kordy
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · Bartsh (Biltmore) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Guilherme Pinheiro Moreira mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · Bartsh (Biltmore) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Carlos Sandoval mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-14 · The Acers at Ron Ehmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Balli
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Bartsh (Biltmore) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Carlos Sandoval mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 41.3% of games
4.0
48.1%
26W–28L · 50.2% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 28.7% of games
7.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 68.9% of games
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.8% of games
8.0mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 66.2% of games
9.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
23 matches
#2 Singles
21%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
17 matches
#1 Singles
11%
12 matches
Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe