← Search

Brooke Oransky

Miami, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 55W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brooke Oransky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-08-15 · Netflix at Ron Ehmann · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sandra Bazain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-04 · Triple Threats at the Alper JCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gricel Boto Bernales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · Triple Threats at the Alper JCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Estefania Lacoa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · Triple Threats at the Alper JCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gricel Boto Bernales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · Triple Threats at the Alper JCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bianca Alvarez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-11-15 · Veltri/Wank · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-05 · Veltri/Wank · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lillie Hileman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-23 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-04 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-27 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-20 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-09-10 · Veltri/Wank · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gretchyn Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.1% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
75.7%
28W–9L · 60.4% of games
8.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 60% of games
9.5
20%
2W–8L · 41.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#1 Singles
10%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova