← Search

Stephanie Galles

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 125W–56L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history181 matches
W
2026-10-19 · Anthamatten/LF/40&over4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Delgado
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-13 · Tasker/PH/40&over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Hassell
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-10-08 · Griffith/LF/Day4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susie Anderson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-07 · Vann/PH/Day4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Hassell
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-10-06 · Anthamatten/LF/40&over4.5W · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susie Anderson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-24 · Griffith/LF/Day4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susie Anderson
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-24 · Tasker/PH/40&over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Hassell
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-23 · Vann/PH/Day4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Hassell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-17 · Tasker/PH/40&over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Lassman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-10 · Tasker/PH/40&over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Harris
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-1
W
2026-09-09 · Vann/PH/Day4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Hassell
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · Griffith/LF/Day4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Bryce
loading the estimate
6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 55% of games
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 50.3% of games
4.0
77.4%
48W–14L · 62.5% of games
4.5
58.5%
31W–22L · 49.8% of games
8.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.4% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 44% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
74.3%
26W–9L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
52 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer