← Search

Kelly Goza

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 139W–104L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history243 matches
W
2026-10-12 · Hale/LF/40&over4.0W · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with April Bonnet
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-05 · Hale/LF/40&over4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-29 · Hale/LF/40&over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Burton
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-24 · Hale/LF/40&over4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-09-23 · Burton/LF/Day4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Burton
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-17 · Hale/LF/40&over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gina Hasty
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-16 · Burton/LF/Day4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-17 · Stitt/LF/18s 8.0X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Habiger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Stitt/LF/18s 8.0X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Velmurugan Venkatachalam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-5
L
2026-06-14 · Stitt/LF/18s 8.0X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Velmurugan Venkatachalam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Burton championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 47.1% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
65.7%
71W–37L · 57.6% of games
4.5
0%
0W–11L · 33.5% of games
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 55.3% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
70.4%
19W–8L · 55.5% of games
8.0mixed
51.5%
35W–33L · 49.5% of games
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
51 matches
#1 Singles
17%
40 matches
#2 Singles
10%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams