← Search

Kimberly Ladkin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bend, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
9 matches · 2W–7L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history9 matches
L
2026-10-25 · BGC-Schatz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Hawkins
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-16 · BGC-Fraley/Carr · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Betty Drullinger
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-09 · BGC-Fraley/Carr · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathleen Carr
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-11-08 · BGC-Fraley/Carr · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathleen Carr
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-12 · BGC-Fraley/Carr · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kami Fraley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-11 · BGC-Fraley/Carr · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Betty Drullinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-11-13 · BGCC-Schatz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynne Ewald
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2022-09-24 · BGCC-Schatz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl McGinnis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2022-09-18 · BGCC-Schatz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynne Ewald
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
25%
2W–6L · 44% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King