← Search

Tre Sullivan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 24W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history50 matches
L
2026-06-12 · Racquets Up · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Morrison
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-05 · Racquets Up · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Toni Durandetta
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Volko
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
W
Roberta Davis / Jean Farris
2025-07-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marlies Farmer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Honey Fisher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
Julie Cary / Carmen Ostrowski
2025-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Stratton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Blake
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Blake
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Honey Fisher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Boudart
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Boudart
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2023-08-18 · Doubles Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcia Halperin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 61.6% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 57.4% of games
7.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer