← Search

Jean Harting

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 44W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history70 matches
W
2026-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Pasquale championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Pasquale championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Pasquale championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · Golden Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Crowley
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · String Theory · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Bader
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · Golden Girls · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Griffin
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-02 · Golden Girls · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Giacomucci
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-16 · String Theory · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eileen Pasquale
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-12 · Golden Girls · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Pasquale
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-08-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Henderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Giacomucci
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eileen Pasquale
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
77.1%
37W–11L · 62% of games
7.0
31.8%
7W–15L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams