← Search

Amy O'Malley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CHADDS FORD, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 19W–15L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history34 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Racquets Up · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathryn Watson championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Racquets Up · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Toni Durandetta
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-29 · Racquets Up · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathryn Watson
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · Racquets Up · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Brasel
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Racquets Up · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Carey
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-05 · Racquets Up · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Rynkowski
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Emmons
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Toni Durandetta
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marlies Farmer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Honey Fisher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-5
L
2024-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Brasel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Honey Fisher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.7% of games
6.0
60%
15W–10L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova