← Search

Michele Bennett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Newark, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 62W–29L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history91 matches
L
2026-08-10 · Ageless Wonders · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clare Matis
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-24 · Team Ageless · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Mitchell
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · Ageless Wonders · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dee Burnett
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · Team Ageless · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Kane
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · Ageless Wonders · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dee Burnett
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · Ageless Wonders · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Fogg
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · Team Ageless · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dee Burnett
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · Ageless Wonders · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula McGowan
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Team Ageless · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Kane
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Ageless Wonders · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Polly Cherundolo
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-04 · Team Ageless · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Woodruff
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · Team Ageless · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Kane
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
64%
16W–9L · 56.8% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
72.4%
42W–16L · 59.8% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 55.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova