← Search

Clare Matis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 41W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history67 matches
L
2026-08-10 · Ageless Wonders · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Bennett
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Team Ageless · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Kane
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · Ageless Wonders · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzanne Courter-Jann
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · Team Ageless · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Hopkins
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · Ageless Wonders · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Koppelman
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-13 · Team Ageless · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Knauss
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Hopkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Knauss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
Patricia Dawson / Jean Farris
2025-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Fogg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula McGowan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Sanders
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-08-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula McGowan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 57.7% of games
6.0
72.2%
26W–10L · 64.9% of games
6.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 63% of the time
#3 Doubles
63%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King