← Search

Suzanne Courter-Jann

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 16W–18L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history34 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Ageless Wonders · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Hopkins
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-07 · Ageless Wonders · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clare Matis
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · Ageless Wonders · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dee Burnett
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula McGowan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula McGowan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dee Burnett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
Jean Farris / Roberta Davis
2025-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula McGowan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Woodruff
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula McGowan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Hopkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Woodruff
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Woodruff
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
10%
1W–9L · 37.7% of games
6.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King