← Search

Suzanne Shoemaker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 29W–22L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history51 matches
W
2026-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynn Erskine championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristal Chestnut championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynn Erskine championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Default
2026-07-22 · Get Smashed · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeanna Kim
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-13 · Absolut Aces · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-25 · Get Smashed · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynn Erskine
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · Absolut Aces · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Smith
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · Absolut Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Kane
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Sorg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with MaryAnne McCarthy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Smith
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristal Chestnut
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
55.8%
24W–19L · 52.3% of games
6.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
17 matches
#1 Singles
24%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#2 Singles
14%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer