← Search

John Spichiger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
31 matches · 8W–23L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history31 matches
L
2026-05-31 · SCC Smash Squad - Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregory Moore
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · SCC Smash Squad - Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Clarke
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · SCC Smash Squad - Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Stayin
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · SCC Smash Squad - Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Riegel
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-04 · SCC Smash Squad - Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Riegel
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-08-21 · Salisbury-Riegel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Chicklo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-07 · Salisbury-Riegel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Brown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-24 · Salisbury-Riegel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ritsu Kuno
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-17 · Salisbury-Riegel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Chicklo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-06-26 · Salisbury-Riegel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Chicklo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2024-08-08 · C3 Salisbury-Riegel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Honse
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-08-01 · C3 Salisbury-Riegel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Whitley Day
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
4.0
25%
3W–9L · 38.8% of games
8.0
10%
1W–9L · 34.4% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#1 Singles
13%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams