← Search

Edward Freeman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 16W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history43 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Indy A55 7.0M JCC Freeman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Moon Kim
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-30 · Indy A55 7.0M JCC Freeman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Friedman
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Indy A55 7.0M JCC Freeman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Friedman
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A55 7.0M JCC Freeman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Schwarz
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · Indy A55 7.0M JCC Freeman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Voege
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · Indy A55 7.0M JCC Freeman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Moon Kim
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-04 · Indy A55 7.0M JCC Freeman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Moon Kim
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
Jeff Pinnick / Jon Young
2025-08-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Friedman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-5
L
2025-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Friedman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
Paul Weir / Jeff Pinnick
2025-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Friedman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Friedman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Schwarz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.8% of games
7.0
40.5%
15W–22L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 65% of the time
#2 Doubles
65%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal