← Search

Steven Kim

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 129W–93L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history222 matches
L
2026-07-20 · Indy A40 4.5M IRCD Dang · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Yang Xiao
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · Indy A40 4.0M IRCD Singh · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yang Xiao
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A40 4.0M IRCD Singh · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Hinkle
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-29 · Indy A40 4.5M IRCD Dang · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vinh Dang
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-27 · Indy A18 4.0M IRCD Xiao · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Jang
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Indy A40 4.0M IRCD Singh · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Wilhite
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-6
W
2026-06-18 · Indy A18 4.0M IRCD Xiao · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mazin Jaliwala
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Largent championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Indy A55 8.0M IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rashid Kourany
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-15 · Indy A18 4.0M SUN IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yang Xiao
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-08 · Indy A18 4.0M SUN IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with HAI GENG
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-18 · Indy A18 4.0M SUN IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Calvert
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
66.4%
77W–39L · 56.1% of games
4.5
22.7%
5W–17L · 37.2% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 63.1% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.5% of games
8.5
36.8%
14W–24L · 42.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.2% of games
7.5mixed
100%
8W–0L · 66% of games
8.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 54.1% of games
8.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
92 matches
#1 Doubles
39%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
43 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams