← Search

Llaurel Gardner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
44 matches · 17W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history44 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Indy A40 4.0M BRE Fischer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Ames
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · Indy A40 4.0M BRE Fischer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Ames
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A40 4.0M BRE Fischer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Ames
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · Indy A40 4.0M BRE Fischer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Ames
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-12 · Indy A40 4.0M BRE Fischer · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Ames
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-07 · CIN CX 7.5 IHP Airgood · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracy Fulling mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-10-03 · CIN CX 7.5 IHP Airgood · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary McAteer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-26 · CIN CX 7.5 IHP Airgood · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marci Williams mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2022-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Effner
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2022-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Weisman
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2022-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Fikes
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2022-03-19 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
39%
16W–25L · 44.9% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
14 matches
#1 Singles
11%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal