← Search

Yang Xiao

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 73W–53L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history126 matches
W
2026-10-06 · Indy A40 4.0M TUE IRCD Singh · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Starnes
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-29 · Indy A40 4.0M TUE IRCD Singh · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Wilhite
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-15 · Indy A40 4.0M TUE IRCD Singh · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Short
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · Indy A40 4.0M IRCD Singh · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francisco Toste
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-20 · Indy A40 4.5M IRCD Dang · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Kim
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · Indy A18 4.0M IRCD Xiao · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Meyer
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-14 · Indy A40 4.0M IRCD Singh · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Kim
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A40 4.0M IRCD Singh · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with HAI GENG
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Indy A40 4.5M IRCD Dang · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christian Dawes
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · Indy A40 4.0M IRCD Singh · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Starnes
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-2
W
2026-06-27 · Indy A18 4.0M IRCD Xiao · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Damon Grothe
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Indy A40 4.0M IRCD Singh · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with JASON RICHMOND
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 47% of games
3.5
100%
17W–0L · 67% of games
4.0
53.8%
42W–36L · 52.9% of games
4.5
30%
3W–7L · 41.3% of games
8.5
0%
0W–4L · 42.7% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.4% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert