← Search

William Barnes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 3W–25L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history28 matches
L
2025-08-14 · Salisbury-Riegel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Brown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-03 · Salisbury-Riegel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Taylor Clarke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-26 · Salisbury-Riegel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ritsu Kuno
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-08-01 · C3 Salisbury-Riegel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Chicklo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-23 · C3 Salisbury-Riegel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Chicklo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-03 · C3 Salisbury-Riegel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-27 · C3 Salisbury-Riegel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Honse
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-07-26 · 4 Salisbury Riegel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Chicklo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-07-20 · 4 Salisbury Riegel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Taylor Clarke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-07-13 · 4 Salisbury Riegel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2022-07-05 · 3 Salisbury Riegel Geezers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Barnes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-06-16 · 3 Salisbury Riegel Geezers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ritsu Kuno
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 43.4% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
11.8%
2W–15L · 29.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal