← Search

Timothy Shantry

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oak Ridge, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 84W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history153 matches
W
2026-09-24 · Schneiderman 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Beardsley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · Schneiderman 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Danny Finnegan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · Schneiderman 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Henderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · Carwile 40s 3.5M Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Hulse
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-15 · McCrary 65s 3.5M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Truell championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-14 · McCrary 65s 3.5M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gene Holder championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-14 · McCrary 65s 3.5M Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Truell championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-04 · Schneiderman 55s 3.5M Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenton Kreager
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · Carwile 40s 3.5M Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Lipp
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-21 · McCrary 65s 3.5M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Still
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-20 · Schneiderman 55s 3.5M Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Truell
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-16 · Carwile 40s 3.5M Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Messick
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
61.1%
44W–28L · 58.4% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
55%
22W–18L · 53% of games
7.5
40%
6W–9L · 41.5% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 45.7% of games
6.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
48 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams