← Search

Kenton Kreager

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 79W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history156 matches
W
2026-10-01 · Schneiderman 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pat Hogan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-22 · Arnett 40s 6.5M Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Casey Cox
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-08 · Arnett 40s 6.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Danny Finnegan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-03 · Schneiderman 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Steve Guild
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-25 · Arnett 40s 6.5M Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Bartels
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · Schneiderman 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Steve Guild
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-16 · Schneiderman 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Danny Finnegan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · Pryzwansky/Loseke 55s Mixed 3.5 Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Page Kreager mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-13 · Pryzwansky/Loseke 55s Mixed 3.5 Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Wilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · Pryzwansky/Loseke 55s Mixed 3.5 Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Page Kreager mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-15 · Pryzwansky/Loseke 55s Mixed 3.5 Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Page Kreager mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-01 · Pryzwansky/Loseke 55s Mixed 3.5 Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Hestenes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
57.6%
49W–36L · 56.2% of games
6.5
50%
19W–19L · 50.7% of games
7.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 43.9% of games
3.5mixed
25%
4W–12L · 40.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
33 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams