← Search

John Gilman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 39W–81L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history120 matches
W
2026-10-01 · Eaton/Moore 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Doug Heberle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-22 · Gilman 40s 6.5M Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Cunningham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · Gilman 40s 6.5M Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Cunningham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · Eaton/Moore 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Cunningham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · Kohlenberg/PT 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Kohlenberg
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · Gilman 55s 3.5 Mixed Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Gilman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Kohlenberg/PT 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Mulvey
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · Gilman 55s 3.5 Mixed Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Gilman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-02 · Kohlenberg/PT 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Mulvey
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-01 · Gilman 55s 3.5 Mixed Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Varner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · Gilman 40s 3.5M Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Eaton
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · Eaton/Moore 55s 3.5M Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Hipsher
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
24.5%
12W–37L · 40.8% of games
6.5
31.6%
12W–26L · 40.2% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 31.4% of games
3.5mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 37.6% of games
6.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.1% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 66.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal