← Search

Houston Core

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 156W–66L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history222 matches
W
2026-09-28 · Rossato 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Hjelt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-09-15 · Rossato/LJ 40s 6.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dave Foster
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-14 · Rossato 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Hjelt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-25 · Rossato/LJ 40s 6.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Just
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-24 · Rossato 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Hjelt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · Rossato 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeremy Madrazo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Core 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Core mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Core 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PM · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Hjelt 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Sweeney
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-30 · Hjelt 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jesse Chandler
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-16 · Hjelt 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Sweeney
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-06-09 · Hjelt 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doug Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
3.5
77.8%
77W–22L · 63.2% of games
4.0
37.5%
15W–25L · 46.4% of games
6.5
75%
12W–4L · 60.6% of games
7.5
68.6%
24W–11L · 57.1% of games
3.5mixed
75%
9W–3L · 62.6% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 62% of games
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 66.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
58 matches
#1 Singles
19%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
36 matches
#2 Singles
10%
23 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal