← Search

Art Fadde

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 144W–74L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history218 matches
L
2026-10-06 · Rosario 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Charlie Lambis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · Rosario 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bryan Vescio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-09-21 · Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Brevda
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-14 · Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Wakefield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-08 · Rosario 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brooks Jackson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-31 · Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joseph Speight
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · Rosario 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bryan Vescio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-24 · Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joseph Speight
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-10 · Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joseph Speight
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-06 · Rosario 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brad Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joseph Speight
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-30 · Herron 40s 4.0 Mixed Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Joplin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
70.6%
72W–30L · 57.3% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
63%
17W–10L · 55.1% of games
8.5
66.7%
38W–19L · 53.9% of games
4.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 51.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 57% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
46 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams