← Search

John Rodenbough

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 93W–94L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history187 matches
L
2026-09-21 · Hilliard 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vikram Penumalli
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mimi Cartee mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-31 · Hilliard 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Luke Rhoten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · Hilliard 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Luke Rhoten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-10 · Hilliard 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vikram Penumalli
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · Dean 40s 4.0 Mixed Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marla Barnwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Hilliard 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0M Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian McLeod
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-29 · Dean 40s 4.0 Mixed Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marla Barnwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · Dean 40s 4.0 Mixed Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Parr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · Hilliard 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0M Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Majestic
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-08 · Hilliard 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0M Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony McGraw
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · Majestic 55s 4.0 Mixed Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Hill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
66.7%
54W–27L · 56.5% of games
4.5
20%
4W–16L · 37.9% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.9% of games
8.5
32.6%
14W–29L · 44.6% of games
9.0
0%
0W–6L · 31.8% of games
4.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 55.4% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
78 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams