← Search

Steve Bailey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
178 matches · 70W–108L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history178 matches
W
Default
2026-10-16 · Kirsteins 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Heinbach
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-30 · Kirsteins 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shaun Fry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · Kirsteins 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin Hulse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Uber 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0M Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Thoma
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-06 · Uber 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0M Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wayne Hamilton
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Uber 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0M Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Freed
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · Magnum 55s 4.0M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryan Bly
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-14 · Magnum 55s 4.0M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shiladitya Paul
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-24 · Magnum 55s 4.0M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ron Mangrum
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-17 · Magnum 55s 4.0M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with DAREN BARNES
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-10 · Magnum 55s 4.0M Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Schneiderman
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-03 · Magnum 55s 4.0M Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vince Credle
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
42.9%
30W–40L · 45.9% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 30.8% of games
7.5
42%
29W–40L · 48% of games
8.5
0%
0W–9L · 29.9% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 34.5% of games
7.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.5% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
54 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams