← Search

Ron Mangrum

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
239 matches · 97W–142L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history239 matches
W
Default
2026-10-07 · Moore 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lee Schneiderman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-05 · Moore 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bruce Eaton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-05 · Jackson 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Rachels
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-24 · Jackson 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin Hulse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-19 · Moore 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bruce Eaton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · Jackson 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Rachels
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas Baxendell
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Brown 40s 4.0 Mixed Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Easley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · Brown 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherrie Kruse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · McFarlin 55s 4.0 Mixed Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shawn McFarlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Brown 40s 4.0 Mixed Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Minerva Loran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · Brown 65s 4.0 Mixed Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherrie Kruse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams77 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
3.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 56.3% of games
4.0
39.1%
25W–39L · 44.3% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 51.3% of games
7.5
40.8%
29W–42L · 47.8% of games
8.5
0%
0W–5L · 22.8% of games
4.0mixed
26.1%
6W–17L · 42.6% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
7.0mixed
40%
10W–15L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
69 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer