← Search

Cal Kimrey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Summerfield, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 86W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history170 matches
W
Default
2026-10-16 · Kirsteins 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Majestic
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-06 · Hilliard 18s 7.5M Combo Tues. PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tony McGraw
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
Default
2026-10-05 · Majestic 40s 7.5 Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with J Stacey Allred
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-28 · Majestic 40s 7.5 Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erik Linn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-23 · Kirsteins 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Kim
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-09-22 · Hilliard 18s 7.5M Combo Tues. PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with J Stacey Allred
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · Hilliard 18s 7.5M Combo Tues. PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Huy Ho
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Kirsteins 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Majestic
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · Hilliard 18s 7.5M Combo Tues. PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian McLeod
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-17 · Majestic 40s 7.5 Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Majestic
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · Hilliard 40s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0M Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Hilliard
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Hilliard 40s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0M Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Dover
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
52.8%
28W–25L · 53.5% of games
4.0
20%
6W–24L · 40.1% of games
7.5
51%
26W–25L · 48.8% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 42.1% of games
7.0mixed
82.1%
23W–5L · 54.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
50 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer