John Kim
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
High Point, NC
334 matches · 176W–158L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history334 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2019–2026
Bui/Hjelt 18s 4.0M Thurs PM
Cochran 18s 4.5M Mon PM
Cochran 18s Tri-Level 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM
Davis 18s 4.0 Mixed Thurs PM
Davis 18s 4.0M Singles Sunday
Davis 40s 4.0M Singles Tues PM
Falvey 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM
Herron 55s 4.0M Tues PM
Herron/Nutt 55s 4.0 Mixed Tues PM
Hilliard 18s 7.5M Combo Tues. PM
Hilliard 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0M Mon PM
Hilliard 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PM
Hilliard 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM
Hjelt 40s 4.0M Wed PM
Houston 4.5M Fall Singles Mon PM
Kirsteins 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM
Schiess 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PM
Williamson 40s 4.0 Mixed Mon PM
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
66.7%
94W–47L · 57.4% of games
4.5
16.1%
10W–52L · 34.8% of games
7.5
70.8%
34W–14L · 59.3% of games
8.5
36.4%
12W–21L · 47.1% of games
4.0mixed
63%
17W–10L · 58.7% of games
8.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.2% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 18.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
71 matches
#1 Singles
18%
59 matches
#2 Singles
11%
37 matches
#3 Singles
3%
10 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.