← Search

Robert Wells

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 49W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history118 matches
L
2026-09-30 · Rhoten 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Carwile
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-23 · Rhoten 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Carwile
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-16 · Rhoten 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Carwile
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · Rhoten 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Carwile
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-19 · Rhoten 55s 7.5M Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Luke Rhoten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-27 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Wells
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Wells
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-21 · Smith 55s 4.0 Mixed Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Evelyn Strader mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas Baxendell
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Wells
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-01 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Wells
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · Smith 55s 4.0 Mixed Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Morris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
60.7%
17W–11L · 53.1% of games
4.0
29.3%
12W–29L · 41.9% of games
7.5
50%
12W–12L · 47.3% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 36% of games
4.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 37.3% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 65.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
27 matches
#1 Singles
16%
19 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova