← Search

Nicholas Baxendell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gibsonville, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 42W–82L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history124 matches
L
2026-10-15 · Cochran 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Conner McGowan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-01 · Cochran 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Conner McGowan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-24 · Cochran 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chuck Burns
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-03 · Cochran 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Conner McGowan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-02 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ron Mangrum
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Nocera
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Wells
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Weikel
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Kim
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Nocera
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-08 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Freed
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · Hankinson Tri-Level 18s 5.0/4.5/4.0M Sunday · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Wells
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
33.9%
19W–37L · 42.9% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 22.2% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.4% of games
8.5
21.1%
4W–15L · 40.3% of games
8.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
24 matches
Singles
14%
17 matches
#1 Singles
11%
14 matches
#2 Singles
8%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams