← Search

Jason Beuchler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 98W–45L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history143 matches
W
2026-09-28 · Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Seth Marshall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
Default
2026-09-21 · Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Wakefield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-17 · Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Brevda
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 7.5M Combo Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Brevda
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · Kohlenberg/PT 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Glenn Vainwright
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-14 · Kohlenberg/PT 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Cohen
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Kohlenberg/PT 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Glenn Vainwright
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · Kohlenberg/PT 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Glenn Vainwright
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · Kohlenberg/PT 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ron Mangrum
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-08 · Kohlenberg/PT 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5M Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ron Mangrum
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-30 · Hilliard 18s 4.0M Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Calkins
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · Hilliard 18s 4.0M Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian McLeod
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
80%
60W–15L · 59.8% of games
4.0
47.1%
16W–18L · 46.6% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 58.1% of games
7.5
66.7%
18W–9L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#1 Singles
9%
13 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova