Kimberly Savelieff
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MATTHEWS, NC
58 matches · 25W–33L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history58 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2023
A18 3.0W 5 LT2 Weber Noffsinger
A40 3.0W 4 LT1 Barker
A55 6.0W LT1 Burgess
C 5.5W LT Burgess
F 3.0S/6.0D LT Savelieff
X18 6.0 LT Quist
A18 3.0W LT2 McKenzie
A40 3.0W LT1 Barker
C 5.5W LT Yakubek
C 5.5W LT2 Savelieff
C 6.5W B LT Galehouse
C 6.5W LT Banas
X18 6.0 LT Kara
A18 2.5W LT2 Savelieff
C 5.5W LT Savelieff
C 5.5W LT2 Savelieff
F 3.0S/6.0D LT Serdinak
X18 6.0 LT Serdinak
A18 2.5W LT Savelieff
C 5.5W LT Ruggles
C 5.5W LT Savelieff
F 3.0S/6.0D LT Serdinak
X18 6.0 LT Banas
C 5.5W LT Ruggles
NEO A18 2.5W LT1 Hofer
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 59.8% of games
3.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.6% of games
5.5
40%
8W–12L · 46.1% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 35.9% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
5 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.