← Search

Kristen McConnell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, IN
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
55 matches · 21W–34L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history55 matches
L
2026-03-29 · Indy A55 6.0W CRC Kennedy · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Oakley
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Schmid
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori McKeown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Bell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Lozen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Bell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-03-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Bell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-3
L
2025-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Ditto
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Bell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-03-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Sutcliffe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Lozen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-1
L
2024-06-24 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
36.4%
12W–21L · 44.8% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 31.3% of games
6.0
75%
6W–2L · 59% of games
6.5
30%
3W–7L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#1 Singles
9%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe