← Search

Frank Ruiz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 15W–14L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history29 matches
L
2025-08-02 · Southern: Chestnut Silver Smashers 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with RICHARD McSPEDON
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-5
W
2025-06-28 · Southern: Chestnut Silver Smashers 55 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gregg Gelman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-05-31 · Southern: Chestnut Silver Smashers 55 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joe Scharr
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with RICHARD McSPEDON
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with RICHARD McSPEDON
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Phillip Raclyn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-08-26 · Chestnut Ridge: Ball Busters · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with RICHARD McSPEDON championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2023-08-05 · Chestnut Ridge: Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Hodgson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-07-08 · Chestnut Ridge: Ball Busters · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gregg Gelman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
L
2023-06-10 · Chestnut Ridge: Ball Busters · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Moran
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2023-01-21 · Chestnut Ridge · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Weiss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2021-10-30 · Eastern/Ruiz/55&Over6.0M · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Swamy Sunkara championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
6.0
65%
13W–7L · 56.6% of games
7.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer