Scott Robuck
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Idaho Falls, ID
196 matches · 120W–76L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history196 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
86.4%
38W–6L · 65.7% of games
3.5
40.6%
13W–19L · 46.6% of games
6.0
72%
36W–14L · 57.9% of games
7.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 32.7% of games
6.5mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 59.1% of games
7.0mixed
51.5%
17W–16L · 54.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
31 matches
#1 Singles
14%
28 matches
Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.